JTBD Idea Validator Report: Stablecoin-Based Payment Rails

JTBD Idea Validator Report

Stablecoin-Based Payment Rails

Idea Synthesis

This idea proposes creating a new payment processing network that uses stablecoins (cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currency) to bypass the traditional credit and debit card rails (e.g., Visa, Mastercard), thereby avoiding their high interchange and transaction fees for merchants.

1. Innovation Type Classification

Type: Business Model

Justification: The core of this idea is not a new product feature but a fundamental change in how payment processing is monetized and structured. By creating new financial rails, it directly attacks the profit model of incumbent card networks and offers a drastically lower cost structure to merchants.

2. Supported Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD)

  1. Reduce transaction costs - The ability to minimize the percentage of revenue paid to third parties for the service of processing customer payments.
  2. Increase profit margins - The ability to retain a larger portion of the revenue from each sale by lowering operational expenses.
  3. Accelerate cash flow - The ability to shorten the time between a customer making a payment and the funds becoming available for use by the business.
  4. Minimize chargeback losses - The ability to reduce financial losses that occur from fraudulent payment disputes and chargebacks.
  5. Feeling secure about financial transactions - The ability to have confidence and peace of mind that customer payments are processed reliably and funds are protected from fraud and theft.

3. Detailed Job-by-Job Analysis

Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria Overview

The following scoring model is used to rank the potential of each JTBD concept on a scale of 1-10. A score of 10 indicates the highest level of potential. The Overall Potential Score is the average of the five criteria.

CriteriaEvaluation Rationale & Methodology
Underserved OpportunityThis score evaluates the gap between the importance of the customer's desired outcomes and their satisfaction with current solutions. A high score signifies a job where customers have critical, unmet needs.
  • 1-3 (Over-served/Well-Served): Current solutions meet or exceed expectations.
  • 4-6 (Adequately Served): Current solutions address key outcomes, but with clear opportunities for improvement.
  • 7-8 (Under-served): Significant gaps exist. Customers are frustrated and actively seeking workarounds.
  • 9-10 (Critically Under-served): A massive gap exists. The current way of getting the job done is broken.
Strategic ImpactThis score measures the concept's ability to either elevate the level of abstraction or to radically improve a critical step in the consumption chain.
  • 1-3 (Incremental Improvement): Minor improvement to a single step.
  • 4-6 (Significant Improvement): Fundamentally overhauls a critical journey or combines steps.
  • 7-8 (Context Elevation): Elevates from a lower-level task to a higher-level functional job.
  • 9-10 (Market Creation): Elevates to a new, higher-level job that creates an entirely new market.
Market ScaleThis score assesses the size and frequency of the target market.
  • 1-3 (Niche/Infrequent): Small, specialized group, infrequent basis.
  • 4-6 (Specialized/Recurring): Distinct segment with some regularity.
  • 7-8 (Broad/Frequent): Large portion of the market on a frequent, recurring basis.
  • 9-10 (Mass Market/Constant): Near-universal need performed with very high frequency.
Solution DifferentiabilityThis score evaluates the potential to create a novel and defensible solution by applying Ulwick's Creativity Triggers.
  • 1-3 (Low): Limited to minor feature-level triggers.
  • 4-6 (Moderate): Can be improved by several Product Platform triggers.
  • 7-8 (High): Can be addressed by powerful, paradigm-shifting triggers.
  • 9-10 (Exceptional): Can be completely re-imagined by combining multiple powerful triggers.
Business Model InnovationThis score assesses the opportunity to create a new, defensible, and profitable business model around solving the job.
  • 1-3 (Constrained): Must operate within an existing business model.
  • 4-6 (Optimized): Allows for cost reductions or ancillary revenue streams.
  • 7-8 (Disruptive): Enables a fundamentally different business model.
  • 9-10 (Transformative): Enables a new model that transforms the value chain.

Click on each job below to see its detailed analysis.

Packaged Concept for Discussion:

A payment processing service that leverages blockchain technology to offer merchants a flat, sub-one-percent transaction fee, directly challenging the 2-4% fees charged by traditional credit card networks and boosting merchant profitability on every sale.

Abstraction Level Analysis:

This job elevates the context from the lower-level task of "swiping a credit card" or "processing a payment" to the higher-level functional goal of "reducing operating expenses." It directly addresses a primary financial pain point for nearly all businesses that accept digital payments.

Idea Deconstruction (Creativity Trigger Analysis):

  • Business Model Trigger: "Eliminate a costly, core business process or activity" - The concept completely removes the need to interact with or pay fees to the card networks (Visa, Mastercard) and their issuing banks, which is the source of the high costs.
  • Product Platform Trigger: "Create a new platform to execute a portion of the job" - It proposes an entirely new set of rails (blockchain) to perform the job of value transfer, which is currently done inefficiently (from a cost perspective) by the existing card platforms.

Challenges:

The primary challenges are merchant and consumer adoption. Merchants need new hardware/software, and consumers need a stablecoin wallet and the motivation to use a new payment method. Overcoming the entrenched habits and network effects of credit cards is a monumental task. Regulatory uncertainty is also a significant risk.

Concept Re-imagination and Enhancement:

The concept could be enhanced by creating a seamless user experience that masks the underlying crypto complexity. For instance, a QR-code-based system where users pay from a simple app linked to their bank account, with the stablecoin conversion happening invisibly in the background. Bundling it with loyalty programs funded by the fee savings could incentivize both merchants and consumers.

Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria:

CriteriaScore (1-10)Evaluation Rationale
Underserved Opportunity9Merchants universally dislike high transaction fees and have little power to change them. This is a critically underserved and highly important need.
Strategic Impact8This concept fundamentally overhauls the payment journey by creating new rails, elevating it beyond an incremental improvement.
Market Scale10Virtually every business that accepts digital payments is a potential customer. The market is global and transactions are constant.
Solution Differentiability8The use of a completely different technology stack (blockchain) creates a powerful and defensible point of differentiation.
Business Model Innovation10This is the very definition of a disruptive business model that aims to transform the value chain of the payments industry.
Overall Potential Score9.0The extremely high potential is driven by a massive, underserved market need and a truly disruptive business model, tempered only by significant adoption hurdles.

Packaged Concept for Discussion:

A financial tool that directly converts a reduction in payment processing overhead into increased net profit on every transaction, allowing businesses to improve their financial health and reinvest in growth.

Abstraction Level Analysis:

This job is a direct outcome of "Reduce transaction costs" but is a higher-level business goal. It elevates the context from a specific line-item cost to the ultimate objective of profitability. It focuses on the "why" behind cost reduction, making it a powerful motivator for business owners.

Idea Deconstruction (Creativity Trigger Analysis):

  • Business Model Trigger: "Turn a cost into a revenue" - While not directly turning a cost into revenue, it significantly reduces a major variable cost, which has the same effect as increasing revenue on the bottom line. This freed capital can be used to generate new revenue.
  • Product Platform Trigger: "Make the platform capable of performing additional jobs" - The platform not only processes payments but also provides analytics to show merchants exactly how much their margin has improved since switching, reinforcing the value proposition.

Challenges:

The primary challenge is making the link between lower fees and higher margins tangible and visible to the merchant. They need to trust that the savings are real and not offset by hidden costs, currency conversion fees, or operational complexity. It also competes for attention with other margin-improvement strategies (e.g., supply chain optimization).

Concept Re-imagination and Enhancement:

Enhance the concept with a real-time dashboard that visualizes margin improvement per-transaction and in aggregate. The tool could offer "what-if" scenarios, showing how reinvesting the saved capital into marketing or inventory could impact overall revenue and profitability, transforming it from a payment processor into a financial planning tool.

Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria:

CriteriaScore (1-10)Evaluation Rationale
Underserved Opportunity9Increasing profit margins is a universal and paramount goal for all businesses. Current payment solutions actively work against this goal, making the opportunity highly underserved.
Strategic Impact8This elevates the conversation from a tactical cost-saving measure to a strategic discussion about business profitability and growth, a significant context elevation.
Market Scale10The desire to increase profit margins is universal across all businesses of all sizes, making the market scale absolute.
Solution Differentiability8The ability to deliver this is based on the unique, low-cost structure of the blockchain rails, making the method of margin improvement highly differentiable.
Business Model Innovation9The solution's business model is predicated on creating and sharing value (in the form of margin) with the merchant, a stark contrast to the extractive model of incumbents.
Overall Potential Score8.8This concept scores very highly as it ties a unique technological solution directly to the most critical business outcome—profitability—for a massive market.

Packaged Concept for Discussion:

An instant settlement payment system where funds from customer transactions are confirmed on-chain and made available in the merchant's wallet within seconds, eliminating the standard 2-3 day waiting period for credit card batch settlements.

Abstraction Level Analysis:

This concept improves a critical step in the "Receiving Journey" of the consumption chain. The delay in receiving funds is a significant pain point, especially for small businesses. By reducing settlement time from days to seconds, it offers a radical improvement over the existing standard.

Idea Deconstruction (Creativity Trigger Analysis):

  • Product Platform Trigger: "Construct the platform to eliminate downtime in the execution of the job" - The 'downtime' here is the settlement waiting period. Blockchain's near-instant finality eliminates this downtime.
  • Product Platform Trigger: "Construct the platform so that it can perform the job at different speeds (faster)" - This directly applies, as the proposed solution is orders of magnitude faster than the traditional banking settlement system (ACH).

Challenges:

The main challenge is the "last mile": converting the stablecoins in the merchant's wallet back into fiat currency (e.g., USD) in their bank account. This requires efficient and low-cost off-ramps, which are still a developing part of the crypto ecosystem. Volatility during the settlement window, however small, is also a concern.

Concept Re-imagination and Enhancement:

Enhance the concept by creating an integrated merchant account that automatically converts a percentage of incoming stablecoin payments to fiat based on the merchant's preference. The system could also enable instant merchant-to-supplier payments using the same rails, creating a B2B ecosystem with the same cash flow benefits.

Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria:

CriteriaScore (1-10)Evaluation Rationale
Underserved Opportunity7While many businesses are accustomed to settlement delays, it is a significant pain point for cash-flow sensitive businesses. Instant settlement is a strong, underserved desire.
Strategic Impact6This is a significant improvement that fundamentally overhauls the settlement journey, but it doesn't elevate the core job of payments itself.
Market Scale10All merchants who accept digital payments face settlement delays, making the target market enormous and global.
Solution Differentiability8Using blockchain for near-instant finality is a powerful differentiator that is very difficult for traditional banking systems to replicate.
Business Model Innovation7This enables new business models for merchants (e.g., just-in-time inventory funded by instant revenue) and for the provider (e.g., fees for instant fiat conversion).
Overall Potential Score7.6The high score is driven by the massive market scale and strong technical differentiability, offering a clear improvement over the status quo for a key pain point.

Packaged Concept for Discussion:

A chargeback-resistant payment rail where transactions, once confirmed on the blockchain, are final and irreversible. This eliminates the risk of fraudulent "friendly fraud" chargebacks, saving merchants significant revenue and administrative overhead.

Abstraction Level Analysis:

This concept radically improves the "Post-Purchase" or "Dispute" journey for merchants. It doesn't elevate the core job of making a sale but rather removes a significant source of friction, cost, and frustration that occurs after the job is seemingly done. It transforms a variable, unpredictable cost into a fixed, predictable one (near zero).

Idea Deconstruction (Creativity Trigger Analysis):

  • Product Platform Trigger: "Make the platform identify and self-correct its mistakes" - In this case, the 'mistake' is a fraudulent transaction. By making transactions irreversible, the platform inherently prevents the 'mistake' of a fraudulent chargeback from ever occurring.
  • Business Model Trigger: "Pass a cost entirely on to the customer" - While not passing a cost, it shifts the burden of proof. In the current system, the merchant is guilty until proven innocent. In this system, the transaction is final, placing the onus on the consumer to be certain of their purchase, which is how cash transactions work.

    Challenges:

    The primary challenge is that consumer protection (the right to dispute a charge) is a deeply ingrained and legally protected feature of the credit card system. Removing it entirely could be a major deterrent for consumer adoption. A solution must be found to handle legitimate issues (e.g., non-delivery of goods) without re-introducing the potential for fraud.

    Concept Re-imagination and Enhancement:

    Instead of complete irreversibility, the platform could incorporate a smart-contract-based escrow system. Funds are held in escrow and released to the merchant only after the consumer confirms receipt of the goods/services. This protects consumers from non-delivery while still protecting merchants from fraudulent post-delivery chargebacks, striking a better balance between the needs of both parties.

    Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria:

    CriteriaScore (1-10)Evaluation Rationale
    Underserved Opportunity8Chargeback fraud is a major, costly, and frustrating problem for merchants, especially in e-commerce. Current solutions are administrative and often ineffective.
    Strategic Impact6This is a significant improvement to a post-purchase journey, removing a major pain point. It overhauls the dispute process but does not elevate the core job of payments.
    Market Scale8While all merchants can experience chargebacks, it is a much more frequent and critical issue for e-commerce and high-risk industries. The market is large and recurring.
    Solution Differentiability9The transaction finality offered by blockchain is a fundamental technical differentiator that is structurally opposite to the reversible nature of credit card payments.
    Business Model Innovation7This enables new business models, particularly for high-risk businesses that are often rejected by traditional processors. It could be monetized as a premium, "fraud-proof" service.
    Overall Potential Score7.6A high score driven by the exceptional solution differentiability that addresses a very painful and underserved need, balanced by the challenge of removing consumer protections.

Packaged Concept for Discussion:

A cryptographically-secured payment network that removes the need for merchants to store sensitive customer credit card data, drastically reducing their liability and the risk of catastrophic data breaches. All transactions are peer-to-peer, minimizing the merchant's role as a financial intermediary.

Abstraction Level Analysis:

This concept addresses a higher-level experiential and emotional job. Beyond the functional aspects of processing a payment, merchants (and their customers) want to feel that the process is safe. This elevates the context from a simple transaction to the emotional state of trust and security, which is a powerful driver of adoption and loyalty.

Idea Deconstruction (Creativity Trigger Analysis):

  • Product Platform Trigger: "Remove platform infrastructure (systems or subsystems) that is not needed to get the job done" - The concept removes the need for complex, vulnerable, PCI-compliant databases for storing customer card information. The public blockchain handles the ledger securely.
  • Information Trigger: "Remove/Hide Something (in the solution or environment)" - It removes the customer's sensitive personal financial data from the merchant's environment entirely, hiding it from potential attackers.

Challenges:

The main challenge is one of perception vs. reality. While a blockchain-based system may be architecturally more secure in some ways, the general public associates "crypto" with hacks, scams, and instability. Overcoming this negative perception and building trust in the security of this new, unfamiliar system is a massive marketing and educational challenge.

Concept Re-imagination and Enhancement:

The concept can be enhanced by partnering with reputable, well-known cybersecurity firms to audit and certify the platform's security. Offering merchants integrated insurance policies against platform-specific losses could also help build confidence. Furthermore, a strong brand identity focused on "trust" and "security," using clear, simple language rather than technical jargon, is crucial.

Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria:

CriteriaScore (1-10)Evaluation Rationale
Underserved Opportunity7Data security is a high-importance need. While solutions like tokenization exist, the fear and liability of breaches are a constant, somewhat underserved anxiety for merchants.
Strategic Impact7This elevates the context from a functional transaction to an emotional job of "feeling secure," which can be a powerful strategic differentiator and trust-builder.
Market Scale10Every merchant and consumer involved in a digital transaction desires security, making the market universal.
Solution Differentiability7The decentralized, cryptographic nature of the solution is a strong differentiator, though it competes with the well-understood security models of incumbent solutions.
Business Model Innovation6While security is a feature, it enables a new business model where "security as a service" is a core part of the value proposition, potentially offered in tiered plans.
Overall Potential Score7.4This concept has strong potential by addressing the critical emotional job of security for a mass market, but its success is heavily dependent on overcoming negative perceptions of crypto security.

4. Consolidated and/or Integrated JTBD Analysis

New Integrated Job Statement:

Optimize payment operations - The ability to manage all aspects of receiving customer payments in a way that maximizes profitability, accelerates access to funds, and simplifies financial management.

Abstraction Level Analysis:

This integrated job elevates the context significantly. It moves beyond solving individual pain points like "high fees" or "slow settlement" to addressing the higher-level strategic goal of running an efficient and profitable payments function within a business. It reframes the solution from a simple cost-cutter to a strategic financial tool.

Creativity Triggers for Integrated Concept:

Trigger TypeCreativity TriggerHow it is Applied
Business ModelEliminate a costly, core business process or activityBy creating a parallel financial network, the solution eliminates the need for merchants to pay interchange fees to card networks and issuing banks, which is the single largest cost in payment processing.
Product PlatformCreate a new platform to execute a portion of the job that is performed inefficiently on the core platformThe existing payment platforms are inefficient in terms of both cost (fees) and time (settlement). The stablecoin-based platform is a new value delivery system designed specifically to execute the job of value transfer more efficiently on these dimensions.
Business ModelDivert a revenue source from someone else in the value chainThe revenue currently flowing to a complex web of banks and networks is diverted and recaptured, shared between the new platform provider and the merchant (in the form of savings).

Challenges:

The success of the integrated concept hinges on overcoming the massive network effect of the current credit card system. It requires a two-sided market solution: convincing millions of consumers to adopt a new payment method while simultaneously convincing millions of merchants to adopt new hardware and software. This is a colossal undertaking that faces significant hurdles in user experience, education, trust, and regulatory compliance.

S.W.O.T. Analysis:

Strengths

Dramatically lower transaction fees (sub-1% vs 2-4%). Near-instantaneous settlement of funds. Inherently global and interoperable rails. Enhanced security and reduced chargeback fraud via blockchain's finality.

Weaknesses

Extremely low consumer awareness and adoption. Perceived complexity and security risks of cryptocurrency. Lack of established trust compared to Visa/Mastercard. Dependent on a volatile and nascent crypto ecosystem.

Opportunities

Widespread and growing merchant dissatisfaction with high fees. Growth of the digital economy and demand for better online payment solutions. Ability to build additional services (loyalty, data analytics, B2B payments) on top of the new rails. Untapped market of crypto-native users.

Threats

Uncertain and potentially hostile regulatory changes. Intense competition from traditional FinTech (Stripe, Block) and new bank-led initiatives (e.g., FedNow). Reputational damage from major security breaches or stablecoin failures in the broader crypto market.

Potential Score & Evaluation Criteria:

CriteriaScore (1-10)Evaluation Rationale
Underserved Opportunity9The core needs of lower costs and faster access to funds are critically underserved for merchants, who have little choice but to accept the current system's terms.
Strategic Impact10This represents market-creating potential. It doesn't just improve payments; it creates an entirely new financial network, elevating the job to strategic financial optimization.
Market Scale10The total addressable market is the entire global volume of digital payments, a multi-trillion dollar industry. The need is constant and universal for merchants.
Solution Differentiability9The use of a decentralized, blockchain-based architecture is a paradigm-shifting differentiator that is fundamentally impossible for incumbents to replicate without disrupting their own models.
Business Model Innovation10The concept is a textbook example of a disruptive business model aimed at transforming an entire industry's value chain and profit pools.
Overall Potential Score9.6This concept earns an exceptionally high score due to its potential to disrupt a massive, inefficient market with a transformative business model and a highly differentiated technology. Its potential is only limited by the immense challenge of achieving mainstream adoption.

Validation Plan

  1. Qualitative Validation:
    • Conduct in-depth interviews with 20-30 merchants across different sectors (retail, restaurant, e-commerce) and sizes (SMB to mid-market).
    • Focus on quantifying their pain around transaction fees, settlement times, and chargebacks.
    • Present the stablecoin concept (without technical jargon) to gauge their initial reaction, perceived benefits, and, most importantly, their concerns and perceived barriers to adoption (e.g., "What would you need to see to trust this?").
    • Interview 20-30 consumers to understand their current payment habits and their willingness to try a new payment method, probing for the required incentives (e.g., discounts, rewards).
  2. Quantitative Validation:
    • Deploy a survey to a large sample of merchants (>500) to score the importance and satisfaction of desired outcomes related to payment processing (e.g., "Minimize the percentage of revenue lost to fees," "Minimize the time for funds to become usable"). This will validate the size of the underserved opportunity.
    • Develop a simple, functional prototype (e.g., a mobile app with a QR code interface) and run a pilot program with a small group of tech-forward, friendly merchants and their customers.
    • Measure key metrics during the pilot: transaction success rate, cost per transaction, settlement speed, and, crucially, user adoption rates and week-over-week transaction volume growth.

Appendix: Creativity Frameworks

Configuration Timing Operation Inputs/Outputs Information Size/Scale/Shape Properties
Separated (Modularized) v Combined (Integrated) Faster v. Slower Processes Synchronous (parallel) v Asynchronous (sequential) Processing Controlled v. Uncontrolled Inputs Make relevant and accurate information available when/where needed Larger v. Smaller Stronger v. Weaker
Linked (networked) v. Unrelated Longer v. Shorter Duration/Lasting Unit v. Batch Processing Open v. Closed System More v. Less Information Longer (Taller) v. Shorter Harder v. Softer (a change in density, malleability, etc.)
Distinct (specialized) v Redundant (generalized) in function or capabilities Continuous v. Periodic Action Coupled v. Decoupled Processing (parts to parts, customers to solutions, etc.) Reusable v. Disposable Aggregated v. Disaggregated Thicker v. Thinner More Rigid v. More Flexible
Nested parts within others (e.g., a cylinder within a cylinder) Earlier v. Later Processes/Events Centralized v. Decentralized Processing Own v. "Rent" Parts or Functions Filtered v. Unfiltered Wider v. More Narrow Hotter v. Colder
Closer v. Farther Away parts or subsystems Flexible v. Standard Timing Directed v. Undirected Activity or Flow Add/Substitute/Combine Something (a part, a material, a chemical, a function, a composite, etc.) Linked (networked) v. Unrelated More v. Fewer Choices Wetter v. Drier
Fixed v. Mobile parts or subsystems Pre-prepared v. Realtime Invert cause and effect (from A→ B to B→ A) Remove/Hide Something (in the solution or environment) Make needed information visible Change/Vary the proportions (relative size, height, etc.) Heavier v. Lighter
Change the location of parts or subsystems (where, relative location, etc.) Controlled v. Uncontrolled Timing Invert mobile stationary elements Borrow an available resource (e.g., from the environment, the customer, wasted by-product or output, space, etc.) Change the nature of information flow (digital, analog, acoustic, optical, radio-frequency, etc.) Segmented (multidimensional, smaller and smaller parts) v Undivided Sharper v. Duller
Change the location of the solution in the environment Change the source of information (e.g., customers, experts, solution, etc.) Change the shape Change the material (metal, plastic, rubber, fabric, paper, etc.)
Add v. Remove Space Automatic v. Manual Change how a function is executed Leave something behind Make something physical "virtual" (a virtual map, a virtual implementation, etc.) Change/Vary the orientation (up, down, angled, etc.)
Restricted v. Unrestricted Access Incorporate, capture, or measure a new input Introduce feedback to improve the process More Symmetrical v. More Asymmetrical Add/Remove a sensory element (sight, sound, feel, taste, smell)
Bundled v. Unbundled Offerings Add v. Remove Motion/Movement Dissolve a feature after useful function (e.g., dissolve, evaporate, etc.) Change the intensity or character of a sensory element (reflectivity, translucence, color, loudness, odor, sweetness, etc.)
More v. Less of something Change the direction of motion (forward, reverse)
Change the nature of motion (e.g., linear, oscillation, rotation, agitation, etc.)
Change where, when, or how motion originates
Trigger Concept Audience/Target Message/Content Channel/Medium Objective/Desired Outcome Timing/Context Sensory/Format
Combine/Integrate Combine niche audiences; Target look-alikes Integrate product benefit with emotional story Use integrated multi-channel campaign Combine awareness and lead gen goals Link campaign timing to related event Combine visual and audio elements
Separate/Unbundle Segment mass audience; Isolate high-value customers Separate features/benefits into distinct messages Use channel-specific messaging Focus solely on brand building Decouple communication from sales cycle Use text-only vs. image-only
Change Scale/Scope Narrow to hyper-niche vs. Broaden target Simplify message vs. Add detail/depth Single-channel focus vs. Mass media blitz Focus on micro-conversions vs. Big sale Short-term promo vs. Evergreen content Minimalist design vs. Rich media
Change Timing/Freq. Reach prospects earlier/later in journey Pre-announce vs. Post-event recap Increase/decrease posting frequency. Drive immediate action vs. Nurture long-term Real-time/reactive vs. Scheduled comms Drip content vs. Content binge
Reverse/Invert Target detractors; Focus on non-users Highlight problems not solved; Use anti-marketing Use unconventional channels; Offline for digital natives Aim to reduce an undesired behavior Communicate during off-peak times Use silence/negative space effectively
Add/Substitute Add a new demographic; Target influencers Add user-generated content; Add humor/emotion Introduce a new social platform; Add experiential element Add a loyalty-building objective Add context-specific triggers (location, weather) Add interactive elements; Substitute video for static image
Remove/Simplify Remove low-engagement segments Remove jargon/technical terms; Shorten message Eliminate underperforming channels Remove steps in the conversion path Remove seasonality constraints Simplify visuals; Remove distracting elements
Automate/Manual Automated audience segmentation Al-generated content variations Programmatic ad buying vs. Manual outreach Automated follow-ups vs. Personal calls Trigger-based comms vs. Manual sends Standard template vs. Hand-crafted design
Borrow/Leverage Leverage partner audiences Use customer testimonials/stories Piggyback on trending topics/hashtags Leverage existing brand equity for new offer Align with cultural moments/holidays Use stock assets vs. Commissioned work
Make Virtual/Physical Virtual focus groups vs. In-person interviews Digital content vs. Print materials Metaverse event vs. Physical pop-up Online sign-up vs. In-store registration Synchronous virtual event vs. Asynchronous content AR experience vs. Tactile mailer
Customize/Standardize Personalized messaging vs. Mass broadcast Adapt content for different segments Platform-specific content vs. Cross-post Customized offers vs. Standard discount Tailor timing to time zones vs. Global launch Vary format by device vs. One-size-fits-all

JTBD Idea Validator Report | Generated on: by Practical JTBD Agent Tools